Rate sponsors on whether they publish their results, share data and register outcomes honestly. Hospitals and patients can then prefer sponsors that behave well.
TrialsTracker-style dashboards already compute results-posting rates per sponsor. A composite score (results posting, time to publication, data sharing, outcome-switching audit, protocol availability) published annually and offered to hospital research offices and patient groups as a factor in choosing which trials to host or join would attach a reputational and recruitment cost to opacity.
Shares Actually fine sponsors who do not post trial results, ClinicalTrials.gov, Failures are hidden.
Shares Failures are hidden, Patients lack understanding, navigation and agency.
Shares ClinicalTrials.gov, Failures are hidden.
Shares ClinicalTrials.gov, Failures are hidden.
Shares ClinicalTrials.gov, Failures are hidden.
Shares ClinicalTrials.gov, Failures are hidden.
Shares ClinicalTrials.gov, Patients lack understanding, navigation and agency.
Shares ClinicalTrials.gov, Failures are hidden.
Every source this page cites, grouped by who published it. Grouping is read from the web address, not assigned by hand.
A source that has moved or gone is reported by the weekly link check. /audit/